Repairer Driven News
« Back « PREV Article  |  NEXT Article »

Lopez: OEM procedure statements must be followed; some parts guidance should be optional

By on
Business Practices | Legal | Repair Operations | Technology
Share This:

Seidner’s Collision Centers director of development and training Gene Lopez told the California Bureau of Automotive Repair this month that OEM repair procedures and position statements should be followed — except in the case of certain recycled and aftermarket parts.

“I have to be a little bit careful, because we’re asking for the cake and wanting to eat it too,” Lopez acknowledged during his presentation at the agency advisory group’s July 12 quarterly meeting.

Lopez drew the BAR advisory group’s attention to a California regulation declaring::

The accepted trade standards for good and workmanlike auto body and frame repairs shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

(a) Repair procedures including but not limited to the sectioning of component parts, shall be performed in accordance with OEM service specifications or nationally distributed and periodically updated service specifications that are generally accepted by the autobody repair industry.

(b) All corrosion protection shall be applied in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications or nationally distributed and periodically updated service specifications that are generally accepted by the autobody repair industry.

This regulation should be reworded to emphasize following OEM instructions, Lopez suggested.

He said the language regarding “nationally distributed and periodically updated service specifications that are generally accepted by the autobody repair industry” referred to I-CAR’s directions — which just said to follow OEM repair procedures anyway.

Lopez implied that leaving regulatory wiggle room for what was “generally accepted by the autobody repair industry” could lead to situations like John Eagle Collision using adhesive instead of Honda-demanded welds to glue a 2010 Honda Fit roof. The shop lost a $31.5 million verdict and later settled for an undisclosed amount.

However, body shops should be permitted to deviate from OEM position statements and use recycled or aftermarket bolt-on parts, according to Lopez.

Sometimes a shop needed to install such parts to avoid a vehicle totaling, Lopez said. Also, insurer business partners say in policies to install used or aftermarket components, even on late-model cars, he said.

“We’re in a real pickle here,” he said.

OEM position statements saying that aftermarket or recycled parts should not be used were “kind of soft language” and a liability protection, Lopez argued. “They don’t tell us directly,” he said, citing language like “does not approve,” “cannot recommend,” or “are not covered.”

Unless the automaker outright uses words like “prohibited” or “not authorized,” it looks like the manufacturer is just “expressing their preference. And we know that it is,” Lopez said.

It might be risky to assume a particular OEM turn of phrase means a position statement can be ignored as an suggestion rather than a requirement.

For example, a Mazda parts position statement declares, “Mazda North American Operations recommends that all maintenance and collision repairs are performed using Mazda Genuine Parts.” But Mazda uses the term “recommends” in at least one procedure-related statement too: “Mazda recommends that all vehicles being repaired for collision damage be scanned before and after the repair.” (Emphasis ours.)

Lopez called parts position statements “difficult to follow” because they are “printed representation of an OEM’s philosophy” intended to achieve “a little brand conquering.”

“They only want to sell their parts,” he said. “And rightly so.”

However, position statements calling for a certain procedure should always be followed, he said.

“There’s a very definite line there,” he said.

Lopez also said all structural or suspension parts should be new OEM, just as the automakers demand.

“Let’s make that certainly clear,” he said regarding those parts.

He also gave the example of a 2018 model with 1,000 miles as a vehicle deserving of all new OEM parts.

More information:

“Bureau of Automotive Repair Advisory Group Meeting – July 12 2018”

California Department of Consumer Affairs YouTube channel, July 12, 2018

OEM1Stop position statement portal

Featured image: Seidner’s Collision Centers director of development and training Gene Lopez speaks July 12, 2018, to the Bureau of Automotive Repair advisory group. (Screenshot from California BAR video)

Share This: