Calif. BAR told regs on sectioning, repair methods may need update, state shops likely not trainingBy on
Associations | Business Practices | Education | Legal | Market Trends | Repair Operations | Technology
Neither some auto body repair regulations nor some auto body shops in California might have kept up with where they need to be, a regional MSO trainer demonstrated to the California Bureau of Automotive Repair earlier this month.
Seidner’s Collision Centers director of development and training Gene Lopez, a former BAR advisory group member, on July 12 presented California Code of Regulations Title 16 § 3303, which defines “Sectioning,” and § 3365, which explains how vehicles must be repaired.
Lopez said some repairers agree that neither part necessarily aligns with the advanced technology and materials on vehicles.
If repairers aren’t designed to support what shops need to do and learn, “we have to bring those regulations up to date.”
Part 3303 states “‘Section’ or ‘Sectioning’ means the replacement of less than a whole part or component by splicing the part or component at non-factory seams.”
But automakers might want shops to section parts at factory seams — or not section a particular part at all. Lopez presented Honda’s July 2017 Body Repair News general guidance on welding and sectioning (which would be superceded by any individual vehicle repair manual).
A knowledgeable collision repairer looks at what metal they’re repairing and the information from the OEM, which can teach that some metals exist that “we cannot cut, absolutely cannot cut,” according to Lopez.
“We have to know this,” Lopez said.
Honda’s Body Repair News indicates it typically wants auto body shops to use a service part without modification. Certain conditions exist when an alteration would be possible — but only if the repairer adheres to specific rules.
“Replacement of steel parts at factory seams and matching the replacement part configuration remain the preferred repair methods.,” Honda wrote in 2017. “However, these methods alone are not always practical nor cost effective in all body repair situations.”
But the shop must still follow Honda’s rules. The manual offers the example of a rear inner panel service part assembly that “may be disassembled at factory seams as required to replace only the damaged portion.”
However, “All basic welding & sectioning guidelines specified in the service information must be observed during partial panel replacement,” Honda wrote. (Emphasis Honda’s.)
“Informed repairers” can make these calls,” Lopez said — and “that’s a key point.”
Much of the California collision repair market might not be adequately qualified. Only about 900 California auto body shops are I-CAR Gold Class, according to Lopez. I-CAR’s 2015 census indicates California had 3,913 auto body shops, with 23 percent Gold Class and 4.3 percent otherwise consistently training, he said. Seventy percent of state repairers might not be training, he said.
“That’s the part that we need to begin taking a look at,” he said.
BAR advisory group member Jack Molodanof said that data provided to the California Department of Insurance put the latest state shop count at between 6,200-6,300. That means the proportion of I-CAR Gold shops could be more like 15 percent, he said.
“I have to believe that, because they are not informed and because they’re not training, they may not know some of the things that the vehicle manufacturers are telling us,” Lopez said of untrained shops.
Lopez also mentioned 16 CCR § 3365, which states:
The accepted trade standards for good and workmanlike auto body and frame repairs shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(a) Repair procedures including but not limited to the sectioning of component parts, shall be performed in accordance with OEM service specifications or nationally distributed and periodically updated service specifications that are generally accepted by the autobody repair industry.
(b) All corrosion protection shall be applied in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications or nationally distributed and periodically updated service specifications that are generally accepted by the autobody repair industry.
He said the discussion of sectioning “nationally distributed and periodically updated service specifications that are generally accepted by the autobody repair industry” referred to I-CAR instructions.
However, I-CAR itself tells everyone to use OEM repair procedures, Lopez said. The only time a repairer would use I-CAR’s guidance for a specific repair involves cases in which the OEM lacked repair procedures or other manufacturer instructions (such as a position statement).
Lopez mentioned the John Eagle Collision case, in which a dealership body shop was hit with a $31.5 million verdict (later settled for an unspecified amount) after it used adhesive to attach a roof instead of the welds Honda directed.
John Eagle Collision’s work on the 2010 Honda Fit in question was probably a “generally accepted procedure, that came from the street,” Lopez said.
“We can’t do that,” he said. OEM procedures must be followed, he said.
“Generally Accepted may lead to poor repairs,’ one of Lopez’s slides stated.
Lopez encouraged the BAR to continue the discussion in workshops or a task force and “re-review” the regulations.
He also brought up 1996 language in the California Business and Professions Code which found California repairers to be unequipped or untrained. Twenty years later, problems described then persist:
(1) Thousands of California automobile owners each year require repair of their vehicles as a result of collision or other damage.
(2) California automobile owners are suffering direct and indirect harm through unsafe, improper, incompetent, and fraudulent auto body repairs.
(3) There is a lack of proper training and equipment that auto body repair shops need to meet the demands of the highly evolved and sophisticated automobile manufacturing industry.
(4) California has no minimum standards or requirements for auto body repair shops.
(5) Existing laws currently regulating the auto body industry could be strengthened.
(6) There is a compelling need to increase competency and standards for the auto body repair industry.
BAR Chief Patrick Dorais called Lopez’s appearance an “amazing presentation” and said he was “committed” to workshops, possibly as early as the next BAR advisory group meeting in October.
BAR advisory group member Nikki Ayers (Independent Automotive Professionals Association) said the issue just raises the “age-old debate” over licensing and if auto body shops should be allowed to operate without training or if anybody is allowed to work as an auto body technician.
“It leads us all back to that,” she said.
Bud Rice, filling in for advisory group member Johan Gallo of the California Automotive Business Coalition, said he thought “this is the next big program that needs to get some attention on it.”
If the average vehicle is in a collision sometime around age 3-6, it’s a “moving window” with new technology constantly being added to the mix, Rice said.
“This problem is a tidal wave that’s going to be hitting us if we’re not careful,” he said.
Board member David Kusa (Automotive Service Councils of California) said licensing has been a “third rail,” but if you ask a consumer if automotive technicians or collision repairers are licensed, “they think that we are licensed.”
“And, obviously, we know we’re not,” he continued.
Perhaps the mission of a task force or work group on the issues Lopez raised should be to educate customers, he said.
Most customers just go where an insurer, friend or Google tells them to go, Kusa said. If a consumer realized that only about 15 percent of shops were “top-tier shops” and 70 percent might not be, “outrage” and a challenge to insurer control of the industry could occur, he said.
“Bureau of Automotive Repair Advisory Group Meeting – July 12 2018”
California Department of Consumer Affairs YouTube channel, July 12, 2018
California Bureau of Automotive Repair Chief Patrick Dorais told Seidner’s Collision Centers director of development and training Gene Lopez he had delivered an “amazing presentation” on July 12, 2018, on the disconnect between regulations and training and automotive technology. Dorias said he was “committed” to workshops, possibly as early as the next BAR advisory group meeting in October. (Screenshot from California BAR video)
Echoing an I-CAR July 2016 post, an I-CAR slide at NACE 2017 reiterates that OEM procedures take absolute precedence. (John Huetter/Repairer Driven News; photo of I-CAR slide)
California BAR advisory group member Nikki Ayers (Independent Automotive Professionals Association) said a presentation by Seidner’s Collision Centers director of development and training Gene Lopez just raises the “age-old debate” over licensing shops or technicians. (Screenshot from California BAR video)