Clear coat for edging isn’t an included operation in CCC, which means shops should know how to add it manually. Those still unfamiliar with adding…
An overwhelming number of collision repairers would like to see shop supply list prices in estimating service, the latest “Who Pays for What?” survey found.
That desire was among the new teaser details released by researchers Collision Advice and CRASH Network last week. On Monday, the duo announced findings that OEM-certified shops surveyed charge anywhere from their steel repair rate to more than $145 an hour to fix aluminum vehicles.
The survey involved 768 collision repairers, about 130 of which were aluminum-certified by at least one OEM. Some of the respondents were in direct repair programs; others weren’t. (To sign up for the February survey and receive its results for free or to buy full survey results, visit www.collisionadvice.com/survey.)
Of those 768 facilities, 594 answered the question “Would it be beneficial to have items like seam-sealer, adhesives, etc., included by brand name in the estimating systems with a list price?”
Estimating services, take note: 92.6 percent answered yes, 3.4 percent said no, and 4 percent were unsure.
More ‘Who Pays’ and similar coverage
- ‘Who pays for what’ survey finds aluminum auto body rates above $145/hour; average $92
- Farmers says it still pays for PDR corrosion protection, aluminum markup
- Survey: Nearly 40% of shops aren’t consistently paid for mandatory coating removal
- Survey: No major insurer blanket-rejects ‘not-included’ procedures — so ask!
“That is a clear message from the collision repair industry to the information providers and the adhesive companies and other suppliers that perhaps they need to work together to include more of these products in the estimating systems to assist shops in charging appropriately,” CRASH Network and Collision Advice wrote.
Did you ask?
As with other “Who Pays for What?” inquiries, the latest study found clear evidence that insurers will reimburse you for your materials — if you bother to ask.
“It is clear from the results of this survey that whether or not a repair facility is reimbursed for a particular item depends, to a certain degree, on whether or not the shop negotiates for it,” Collision Advice and CRASH Network wrote. “Though reimbursement frequencies do vary by insurance company, DRP status and region of the country, it is clear that while none of the procedures in this survey are universally paid by insurers, none are universally rejected by insurers either. (Emphasis in original.)
“In this survey, a good example of this is ‘weld-through primer.’ Nearly 3 out of 4 shops that negotiate for this item are paid most, if not all, of the time, yet more than 20 percent of shops said they never even attempted to charge for this item. In the Northeast and West regions, the percentage of shops being paid always or most of the time exceeds 80 percent on this item – and all eight insurers pay for it.”
The researchers released the example of boron drill bits. For each of the nation’s eight largest auto insurers, they found more than half of the hundreds of respondents said they’d never asked to be repaid for the supplies.
Now, those who did ask weren’t guaranteed to succeed. Between 32 percent (State Farm) and 47.2 percent (Progressive), reported the insurer never agreed to a request for bit reimbursement. But on average, 36 percent of repairers who’d negotiated were paid “always” or “most of the time,” according to the researchers.
The survey asks about DRP status and looks at payment odds based on that as well.
In the boron bit example, DRP shops were for some insurers (GEICO, USAA and Progressive) noticeably (10-plus percentage points) less likely to ask to be paid for the supply than the non-DRP shops. However, for other insurers, the shops by a margin of a few percentage points were more likely to ask.
However, the DRP shops which did ask often reported far lower “never” and far higher “always” percentages (10-plus points) than the non-DRP shops who made the request.
Armed with the knowledge that insurers will actually pay you, the study authors urge making your case for some high-usage items. Arm yourself with the proof the procedure is necessary and not-included, they urge — advice we’ve heard from other shops in and out of DRPs.
“Next, prepare your staff to negotiate for these items, perhaps choosing two or three to focus on each quarter. Gather together the negotiation tools you can use to show: that the item or procedure is necessary; that it is not included; and, what it is worth if there is not a pre-determined formula in the estimating system you are using.
“Such tools can often be found within bulletins and documentation from automakers and vendors; in the guides or procedures pages for your estimating system; or through other online information sources.”
As the survey indicates, it won’t always work, but if you’ve got the documentation for your case then, well, then you’ve got it for court — another venue some shops have used.
An overwhelming number of collision repairers would like to see shop supply list prices in estimating service, the latest “Who Pays for What?” survey found. (Andrii Silantiev/Hemera/Thinkstock)
Researchers at CRASH Network and Collision Advice released the example of boron drill bits from the “Who Pays for What?” study published in January. (Provided by Collision Advice/CRASH Network)