Tesla vows to add 300 more body shops soon, drop poor performers, ‘personally manage each car’By on
Business Practices | Market Trends | Repair Operations | Technology
After a Tesla owner complained Tuesday in the Motley Fool about a long wait time for parts, Tesla fired back — at its collision repairers.
Actually, it didn’t just fire back, it went nuclear.
“We are applying brute force to this immediately,” global sales and service President Jon McNeil announced Friday on the Tesla Motors Club forum. He said Tesla staff would “personally manage each car on behalf of our customers that are in 3rd party body shops,” add 300 shops “over the next few weeks” and dump “poor performing shops” from the network.
“This week, the service team hit a global customer service satisfaction record,” wrote “JonMc,” who is identified by a poster on the site and by the alternative fuels news website Electrek as McNeil. “The team has done a fantastic job on what we control currently: our own service centers. We’re now turning our efforts on the centers we don’t control: accident repairs in body shops.”
The Motley Fool post by Evan Niu, who says he invested in Tesla back in 2011, briefly worked for Tesla in 2016 and was a Tesla fan prior to the experience, described “nearly eight months” of waiting for repairs on a rear-ended Tesla Model S.
According to Niu, the issue was largely due to Tesla’s parts slowness and lack of ownership of the issue:
After three months had passed and the body shop had still not received all the necessary parts, we began reaching out to Tesla directly through their customer service channels, which serve as a liaison to the internal parts department.
Initially, no customer service representative that we interacted with was willing to take ownership of our issue. We kept getting passed between representatives with little to no useful information (a customer service manager eventually took ownership of handling our issue after repeated escalations). Parts had started to trickle in, but there still weren’t enough to start the repair, so our car continued to sit idly. … During one of the escalations in November (four months after the accident), Tesla guaranteed us that all parts would arrive at the body shop no later than the last week of November. They didn’t.
In mid-December, the shop finally received enough parts to start working on the car (but not all of them). … The body shop would begin the repair in early January 2017 after the holidays. There were still a few outstanding parts, including bulb rivets. … We again contacted customer service, and Tesla again assured us they had just shipped the remaining parts for overnight delivery. … in the final week of January, the shop confirmed that they had indeed received all remaining parts necessary to complete the repair. …
It turns out that the 12V battery is also now in need of replacement, as it will no longer hold a charge … Tesla uses exactly one specific supplier for its 12V batteries, which is struggling to keep up with Tesla’s demands. We’re now looking at yet another delay for the 12V battery …
However, McNeil put the blame for the delay on Stuttgart Auto Body, which only repairs Tesla, Mercedes and BMW vehicles.
“The body shop in the OP article did not begin repairs on the car for three months and then ordered more than 90 parts and took over seven months to repair the car,” McNeil wrote. “Neither of those are indicators of competence. To top it off, they blamed their performance on Tesla. We know from complaints that the body shop experience needs to get a lot better – and fast.”
Electrek said it contacted Stuttgart Auto Body, which “said that they wanted to reply to Tesla’s claims, but that ‘it would take a few days’.”
Other posts on the thread McNeil joined seemed to assign more blame to Tesla than the shops involved. As “seclinton” wrote regarding a collision that took four months to repair:
Stop blaming the body shops. My car’s timeline of posts show it was torn down and parts ordered in less than 2 weeks after the accident. Even a supplemental order was placed by wk4. I even ordered (rear-facing seats) in February, and that parts kit shipped almost immediately.
Fact is the stamping and supplier lines are focused on production, not legacy or warranty parts. It’s a gap in the business model and will take time to fix. I understand that. And thankfully, for the eager and persistent, once you find the way to make the squeaky noise (media attn; getting insider direct phone numbers; going to Deer Creek lobby; making a scene at the factory service dept,…i digress) will tend to unstick parts.
However, McNeil predominantly blamed the certified Tesla network for such slow collision repairs:
Most of the customer complaints about body shops mentioned parts, so we focused on this issue. To date, we’ve reduced backlog by over 80%.
Even though we reduced part wait times, we continued to dig into the body shop complaints. What we found was astounding – cars sat at body shops for weeks and sometimes months before the body shops took action and, more often than not, the body shops blaming Tesla for parts delays were the very shops that hadn’t even ordered parts or started the repair.
The he-said-she-said of Niu’s Model S and the other incidents raised by Tesla owners is secondary right now to the broader, industrywide takeaways coming out of all of this.
For those on Tesla’s collision repair network, know that the OEM has been publicly embarrassed and has pledged to pay close, personal attention to this issue, so be ready for added scrutiny from Tesla liaisons.
“If you have an issue with a shop, please PM me directly and our team will advocate and manage your repair,” McNeil wrote.
“Tesla owners will get the service they expect from us – period.”
Know too that the company apparently isn’t afraid to blame auto body shops publicly — or potentially drop them from the program. As the “seclinton” post suggests, being on one’s best behavior and backing it up with documentation could be vital in proving a shop held up its end and winning any “court of public opinion” dispute arising out of a repair-related issue.
For those not on Tesla’s collision repair network, know that the company is “hiring.”
There are 300 slots about to open up in the network — just in time for the mass-market Tesla Model 3. With the mass-market electric vehicle seeing six-figure pre-order demand globally and due to come out later this year, according to a Seeking Alpha transcript, getting in early on the Tesla network could be a smart business move.
Tesla didn’t reply to our inquiry Friday seeking more detail into the Tesla network expansion and Model 3’s repair access. But McNeil’s addition of 300 body shops suggests that collision repair on the Model 3 will, like the S and X, be restricted to Tesla’s network.
And just spitballing: Tesla’s handling of the situation also raises an interesting hypothetical in the new world of OEMs taking a more active role in collision repair. Let’s say a shop is certified for Tesla and is on a DRP for Insurer XYZ. You’ve got Tesla looking over one shoulder demanding their customers’ cars get out first because some bad press went viral. Insurer XYZ is looking over the other shoulder pointing to a lousy cycle time KPI and demanding its customers start getting speedier service. Throw in other DRP or OEM demands, and things start getting even more complicated. Who gets the attention?
“Repairing My Tesla Model S Has Been an Utter Nightmare — and It’s Mostly Tesla’s Fault”
Evan Niu in the Motley Fool, March 7, 2017
“Motley Fool story – Tesla Replacement Part Delays”
Tesla Motors Club, March 7, 2017
“Tesla to ‘add 300 body shops to its network in the next few weeks’, says Tesla President”
Electrek, March 10, 2017
“Tesla says it’s ‘actively working to improve service’ in body shop network, eliminating low performers”
Electrek, March 9, 2017
Tesla fourth-quarter 2016 earnings call transcript
Seeking Alpha, Feb. 23, 2017
Tesla’s Fremont, Calif., factory is shown in this image uploaded in 2015. (Provided by Tesla)
The Tesla Model 3 is shown in this 2016 promotional image. (Provided by Tesla)