Repairer Driven News
« Back « PREV Article  |  NEXT Article »

CCC: ADAS might be starting to eat into auto repair frequency

By on
Associations | Business Practices | Education | Insurance | Market Trends | Repair Operations | Technology
Share This:

A CCC analyst on Tuesday said market data appears to show later-model vehicles getting into fewer crashes because of advanced driver assistance systems.

CCC lead analyst and director Susanna Gotsch showed a Collision Industry Electronic Commerce Association CIECAst webinar data that she said “certainly suggests” fewer new vehicles are appearing in the overall claims mix.

Typically, the proportion of vehicles involved in claims each calendar year tend to correspond roughly to the proportion of vehicles in each demographic, Gotsch demonstrated with a chart Tuesday.

But that’s not the case for vehicles 0-3 years old in calendar year 2018 and what’s estimated to be the statistics for this year, Gotsch showed. She emphasized the 2019 year in the chart Tuesday.

Gotsch presented a similar chart in her September “Industry Trends” report. Data came from CCC, the Autocare Association and IHS Automotive.

“The decline in volume share for those vehicles aged 0-3 years however is larger (1.5 percentage points) for auto claims than for vehicles in use (0.6 percentage points),” she wrote. “With nearly 50 percent of MY2019 vehicles now equipped with ADAS, where ADAS has been shown to reduce the most common time of accident by nearly 50 percent, back of the envelope math suggests the difference in volume share loss is likely best explained by growing ADAS prevalence.”

A little decline in frequency on a national scale might still trickle down to a noticeable effect at the micro level. A smaller shop living repair order to repair order, a larger shop depending on volume to compensate for a thinner margin, and a piece-rate technician awaiting their next vehicle all might be affected by minor frequency drops.

Advanced driver assistance systems have spread to more of the vehicle fleet in the past two calendar years as OEMs close in on their self-imposed 2022 deadline to make autobraking standard. Repairers also should remember that OEMs were effective May 2018 required to install backup cameras on every new vehicle they built.

Gotsch said Tuesday that 29 percent of the 2017 model year had autobraking — a proportion rising to 45 percent for the 2018 model year and estimated to hit 48 percent of the 2019 editions. An estimated 15 percent of all vehicles on the road had at least one form of ADAS already, she said Tuesday.

However, some trends bear out in repairers’ favor to drive frequency back up, though Gotsch said it ultimately might just “net out.”

Commute time is “sort of a grim picture, frankly,” and traffic is more congested, which should make for more crashes, she said.


Though the “small but meaningful decline” in frequency due to ADAS existed, severity continued to rise, Gotsch said. She expected claim costs overall (including total losses) to be up as much as 5.5 percent, compared to a little over 4 percent last year.

However, “we do hope” repair costs will decline as ADAS that fails to prevent a crash at least slows the vehicle enough to cut down its severity, she said.

CCC research has found that vehicles with ADAS have fewer low-speed but more moderate-speed crashes than vehicles that don’t. However, the ADAS-equipped vehicles also see fewer high-speed crashes arise, which suggests the cars are slowing themselves enough that the collision isn’t as bad as it could have been.

CCC and Honda have found repair costs fall in certain crash conditions because of that kind of mitigation. The IIHS in 2014 research highlighted in the CIECA webinar also reported that a 2013 Mercedes C-Class might emerge from a $28,000 25 mph rear-end crash with causing only $5,700 worth of damage. Its autobraking system — yes, they date back further than you think — was able to knock 13 mph out of a crash, even if it doesn’t avoid the collision entirely. In case you’re interested, the 12 mph crash gave the C-Class $3,438 worth of damage and hit the Malibu with $2,277 worth. The 25 mph crash caused $9,457 worth of damage to the C-Class and $18,674 to the Malibu.)

CCC found the average collision loss cracked $4,000 for the first time this year, based on data through July. It found the average repair in 2018 cost nearly $1,000 more than 2004, with most of the increase coming from replacement part prices and additional miscellaneous operations (such as scanning, which the industry didn’t realize it had to do until 2016).

Gotsch said the average keys-to-keys cycle time roughly grows by two days for every $1,000 increment in repair cost, and a $10,000 repair can mean “over 30 days.”

She said many insurers are considering revisiting their rental policies in light of repairs taking longer than provided for in the contract.

More information:

“CIECAst: What to Expect in 2020: Developments in the automobile in 2019 and what that may mean in 2020”

Collision Industry Electronic Commerce Association, Oct. 15, 2019

“Where We Are with ADAS”

CCC, Sept. 4, 2019

“Industry Trends with Susanna Gotsch – September 2019”

CCC YouTube channel, Sept. 4, 2019


Traffic moves Feb. 27, 2019, in Las Vegas, Nev. (sanfel/iStock)

CCC director and lead analyst Susanna Gotsch said Oct. 10, 2019, that market data appears to show later-model vehicles getting into fewer crashes because of advanced driver assistance systems. She presented similar data, shown here with emphasis added by Repairer Driven News, in a September CCC Industry Trends article. (Provided by CCC; emphasis added by Repairer Driven News)

Share This: